
Guides
Part of How to handle corrections and newsroom transparency after an error report
How to Write Newsroom Correction Notices and Publish Them
Learn how to write newsroom correction notices, publish fixes across channels, notify people harmed, and log approvals and channel confirmations.
What to take away
- Freeze the published version and gather the original records before anyone edits a word.
- Name the wrong fact and the right fact in the same notice, so a reader can compare them.
- Call a factual error a correction; "updated" hides the change and readers notice.
- Repair every place the error ran, including captions, alt text, alerts and syndicated copies.
- Log the decision, the approver and the time each channel confirmed the fix.
To write newsroom correction notices, start with the change readers need to see. A correction works when a reader who saw the original can tell, in one pass, what changed. That means naming the wrong fact and the right fact, not describing the repair in the abstract. The sequence below is the order that keeps a newsroom from publishing a second error while fixing the first.
Stop the spread before you start drafting
Pause scheduled posts, newsletters, syndication feeds and broadcast repeats that carry the disputed claim. Do not delete anything. Save the article as HTML or PDF, plus screenshots, audio or video, the social posts, metadata and timestamps.
For an error about a death, an identity or an active safety situation, publish a holding correction while the fuller review runs. The holding line states the confirmed correct information. "We are looking into it" tells the reader nothing and leaves the wrong version standing.
Write the disputed claim down as a claim
Copy the exact sentence, headline, number, caption or omission under review. Then write the statement you believe is correct. Two lines on paper stop the argument from drifting into tone, framing or unrelated grievances.
Claim vs. Correct Fact
Published claim
- Vote
- Unanimous
- Evidence
- None cited
- Affected places
- Headline, para 3
Correct fact
- Vote
- 6-1
- Evidence
- Minutes, roll-call video
- Affected places
- Chart, social card
| Item | Text |
|---|---|
| Published claim | "The board voted unanimously" |
| Evidence | Official minutes and roll-call video |
| Correct fact | Vote was 6-1 |
| Affected places | Headline, paragraph 3, chart, social card |
Go back to the records
Return to the original documents and the reporter's notes. Check the document version, the date, the jurisdiction, the speaker, the denominator and the surrounding context. If a complaint triggered the review, weigh its evidence on its merits rather than on who filed it.
Ask the reporter and the assigning editor what they relied on. Contact the subject or the responsible agency when that resolves the question faster. If the record is already clear, keep moving.
Before drafting, the reporter or reviewing editor records the evidence and the assigning editor decides whether the claim was wrong and which label applies. An editor with authority over the desk approves the notice's wording and placement before publication. If the assigning editor wrote the original, another editor should approve it; escalate disputed or high-harm cases to the standards editor or editor in chief.
Pick the right label
Use a correction when a fact, name, quotation, number, image or implication was wrong. Use a clarification when the wording was true but reasonably misled.
Which label fits?
Was a fact, name, quote, number, image or implication wrong?
Correction
Was the wording true but reasonably misleading?
Use an update when later events changed the situation.
Use an editor's note when readers need the wider story of a serious failure, the way a circular citation case can require more than a one-line fix.
A spelling fix that does not touch identity can stay silent under a published policy. A wrong name in a caption is not a typo. It gets a visible correction.
The Society of Professional Journalists' Code of Ethics calls for mistakes to be corrected promptly and prominently. The New York Times' Corrections page is a reader-facing example of how a newsroom presents corrections.
Draft the notice
The formula is short: label, date and time, what the earlier version said, what is correct, and where the fix was applied.
Use this fill-in notice: > Correction, [date and time]: An earlier version of [story or item] said [incorrect claim]. The correct information is [correct fact]. We corrected [specific locations and channels].
Correction notice formula
- LabelCorrection
- Date and time
- What the earlier version said
- What is correct
- Where the fix was applied
Correction, August 28, 11:20 a.m.: An earlier photo caption identified Councilmember Ana Rios as Maria Rios. The photograph shows Ana Rios. We corrected the caption, alt text, social card and photo metadata.
The Plain Writing Act of 2010 requires federal agencies to use plain writing in covered documents. The Federal Plain Language Guidelines offer practical advice a newsroom can use as a model, not a rule that governs newsrooms. Apply the guidelines on short and simple writing: cut modifiers that add nothing, and keep one term for one thing.
Place it where the reader meets the error
Put a material correction where readers see it before or while they read the repaired claim. A note at the top suits a headline, a central premise, an identity, a death, a safety claim or a legal error. A note inside the body can suit a minor fact.
Scholarly publishing solved the same placement problem structurally. Under the National Library of Medicine's errata citation policy, the notice keeps its own citation and is joined to the original article by a two-way link, the arrangement already used for retractions.
A reader who lands on the flawed record is carried to the notice instead of having to hunt for it.
Repair each format at its source
Text and web. Fix the headline, the summary and the body. Then fix tables, captions, alt text, structured data and page metadata. Check the mobile view and any cached preview.
In the content management system (CMS), open the canonical story record and add the correction notice where readers will see it. Update the affected headline, summary, body, captions, alt text and metadata; save and publish the changes, then check the public page, mobile view and cached preview. Link the story record to the correction-log entry.
Repair each format
- Text and webheadline, summary, body, tables, captions, alt text, metadata
- Photo and graphicscaption, embedded metadata, chart labels
- Audio and videoscript, transcript, subtitles, show notes, archived media
- Alerts and socialnew alert, replace posts, reply to original
- Partnersadvisory naming item, confirm replacement
Photo and graphics. Correct the caption and the embedded metadata, then retransmit to clients with a visible correction label. Fix wrong labels inside a chart, not just the prose around it.
Audio and video. Correct the script, transcript, subtitles, show notes and archived media where you can. When the wrong version stays accessible, put a spoken or on-screen notice before playback.
Alerts and social. Send a new alert when the first one carried a material error. Correct or replace the platform posts, and reply to the original when that helps readers find the repair.
Partners. Send an advisory that names the corrected item and ask each partner to confirm replacement. An updated feed is not proof that an earlier copy came down.
Tell the people who were wronged
Contact anyone wrongly named, accused, declared dead, misquoted or otherwise harmed. Say what was corrected and where. Do not make their acceptance a condition of publishing the fix, and give them a contact for concerns that remain open.
Log the repair
Create one log entry for each correction and link it to the story's CMS record. Record the disputed and corrected claims, evidence, decision and label; the approver and approval time; each affected channel, who confirmed its repair and when; and where the public notice appears. Store the entry in the newsroom's correction log with the story record, retain it under the newsroom's records-retention policy, and append later follow-up rather than overwriting the original entry.
Log the repair
- Original publication time and discovery time
- Who raised the issue and evidence reviewed
- Decision and approver
- Exact notice text
- Hash or snapshot of corrected version
- Completion time for each channel
- Owner of follow-up review
Ask which control failed
Name the step that let the error through:
- arithmetic
- transcription
- copy editing
- photo metadata
- alert compression
- shift handoff
- translation
- the CMS itself Change that step. A reminder to be more careful is not a control.
Common questions
Should a correction repeat the wrong fact?
Usually yes, briefly, so readers can see what changed. Leave out harmful private details that no longer need to circulate.
Can the newsroom blame a source?
Explain where the information came from when that matters, but own the publication decision. "A source gave us the wrong number" is not a correction.
Must a corrected headline keep the old wording?
No. Replace harmful wording, then state the prior error in the notice and in the internal record.
When should an apology be added?
When the harm and the circumstances warrant one. An apology never replaces a precise factual correction.







